APPLYING THE SOCIOTEXT MODEL TO EXPLORE LANGUAGE AND SOCIETY IN PHILOLOGY
Abstract
The SocioText Model is an interdisciplinary framework designed to
examine the dynamic relationship between language and society within philological
research. The model also goes beyond the conventional form-based methods and
incorporates linguistic structure, social context, historical conditions, and power
relations to determine how text simultaneously reflects and constructs social
realities. Locating the philological texts in their socio-cultural contexts, the model
can offer a better understanding of how meaning-making occurs across time, as the
given study illustrates in the case of lexical choice, rhetorical strategy and discursive
structure in literary and non-literary texts. The probe underscores the role of
language in configuring social identity, ideological location as well as cultural worth.
Most of the variables, such as class, gender, religion, and institutional authority are
discussed to ascertain how they influence the production and reception of the text.
These qualitative results are supported by quantitative results that demonstrate that correlations between social positioning and linguistic complexity remain
constant, and annotation consistency was higher than 90 and the stability index
above 0.9 confirming the SocioText Model that interprets qualitatively and analyses
sociolinguistically and historically. It provides an organized, flexible resource to the
treatment of texts as socially constructed phenomena in making philology both a
socially active and analytically rigorous field of study that can show empirically the
reciprocal interrelation that exists between text and society.
References
- Dronyakina, N. V., & Chemezova, E. R. (2021). The methodological strategy for the continuous text analysis in the teaching of philological sciences. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 113, p. 00007). EDP Sciences.
- Maloivan, M., & Dyrda, I. (2025). Peculiarities of The Formation of Intercultural Competence of Students Majoring In English Philology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Education, (6 (1)), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-9083-2025-6(1)-29-38
- Dumbleton, A. (2023). Antiquarianism, philology, and translation studio in the epistolary translations of Sir John Hobart and Nicholas Bacon. The Seventeenth Century, 38(4), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2023.2174175
- Dumont, L., Fondu, Q., & Veron, L. (2023). Marxism and literary criticism. In Marx, a French passion (pp. 191-201). Brill.
- Favino, F. (2022). Giovanni Alfonso Borelli’s Last Will (1679, December 31st): The Graph of an Ego-Network. Nuncius, 37(1), 144-173. https://doi.org/10.1163/18253911- bja10020
- Shaklein, V. M., & Olivia, N. B. A. (2019). Preparation Specifics of Students-Philologists: Modern Technologies of Literary and Linguistic Text Analysis. International Journal of Language Education, 3(2), 91-98.
- Jononovich, N. A. (2025). Preparation Specifics of Students-Philologists: Modern Technologies of Literary and Linguistic Text Analysis. Pedagog, 8(11), 37-45.
- Dronyakina, N. V., & Pirozhkova, A. O. (2021). Methodological tools for teaching prospective teachers-philologists to interpret English poetic texts. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 113, p. 00010). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111300010
- Kotsyuba, I., Sazhneva, L., Shikov, A., Shtennikov, D., Zhirkova, G., & Triandofilidi, I. (2023). The development of the application for support the intellectual analysis of texts of the humanities and socio-economic cycle. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 381, p. 01043). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338101043
- Turbina, O., Raevskaya, M., Bernat, O., & Chernysheva, M. (2017). The Content of Philological Competence Formed in The Framework of The Master’s Programme “Philology”. In INTED2017 Proceedings (pp. 6405-6410). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1481
